Showing posts with label drjohnson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label drjohnson. Show all posts

Monday, 9 March 2009

The Hole in the Zero: update

Site update: I just expanded last February's The Hole in the Zero JSBlog post - about MK Joseph's amazing 1967 novel of that name - to include an enlightening 1969 review by JP Downey in the New Zealand literary magazine Landfall.

Briefly, The Hole in the Zero is a tour de force of literary SF in which four characters are cast into the 'Nothing' outside space and time, where they play out their conflicts in a series of incarnations into a diverse set of different realities. The subject of Dr Johnson brought the book back to mind, since it has an episode in which its character Paradine, in one such reality, becomes a Frankenstein-like magus who creates an artificial man clearly modelled on Dr Johnson.

The carved eyelids blinked and opened and wrinkled up as the eyes peered out shortsightedly on upon the world. The figure sneezed enormously and sat up. He draped over its shoulders a loose white robe and led it gently to a chair, where it sat like an ancient emperor, with its vast swathed body and its noble flawed face. He held a glass of cordial to its lips; it took the glass from him, swallowed it down, and sighed appreciatively.

"Claret," it said in a voice like the echo of thunder, "is the liquor for boys, port for men, but he who aspires to be a hero must drink brandy."

"What am I to call you?" said Paradine.

"John Samuelson," said the figure firmly.

"You are now alive, John Samuelson. Does it give you pleasure to be alive?"

"To talk is good and to laugh is good," said the figure, holding out its glass to be replenished. "A tavern-chair is the throne of human felicity."

"Then what is the purpose of life?"

The figure rolled about in distress, and the seamed face crumpled. "The whole of life ... is ... but keeping away the thoughts .. of death."

"Is there no choice?"

"Nature sets her gifts on the right hand and on the left," said the figure more calmly.

"Are not all things possible to the mind?"

"We may take our fancy for our companion but we must let reason be our guide. All power of fancy over reason is a degree of insanity."

"By what then will you rule your life?"

The figure started to its feet and its voice rolled out in full thunder. "Give me something to desire," it shouted, staring with blank eyes to the east, suddenly cold and rigid, a heroic statue eroded by the ages.

All of the creature's words are Johnson quotations, and this poignant vignette of his enthusiasms and torments is one of many literary allusions in The Hole in the Zero.

This particular section of the book has many layers, drawing on the Frankenstein mythos even deeper than the basic scenario of Paradine animating his creation on a slab. Paradine's laboratory also contains a set of homunculi, little figures with single strong personality traits

He passed slowly along the bench where stood his first tentatives, the tiny homunculi, some dreaming, some frenziedly active, in their warm prisons of glass. They were the toys of his youth, childish but lovable - the musician-prince with his little tinkling harp; the spider-woman who had eaten her mate; the idiot-girl, bald and yellow; the spangled juggler perpetually whirling his indian-clubs; the knight, like a small iron statue; the duchess making eyes at the tattered beggar inthe next jar; the sleep-walker; the washerwoman; the siamese-twins; the black boxer sparring with his own shadow; the girl who sang perpetually on one note amid the shining golden waterfall of her own hair.



These are very similar to the jarred homunculi created by Dr Pretorius 1 in the film The Bride of Frankenstein: a king, a queen, an Archbishop, the Devil, and a little ballerina who "won't dance to anything but Mendelssohn's Spring Song and it gets so monotonous". The allusion appears self-referential too, in that in The Hole in the Zero, the main characters are similarly forced to play out scenarios shaped by the fixtures of their individual personalities. Some of Paradine's homunculi are also applicable to the characters themselves. Anyhow, for context, see The Hole in the Zero.

1. The above Dr Pretorius tribute site says "One wonders where Dr. Pretorius got the little costumes-the crown, capes, tutus and ballet slippers. Did he sew them himself? Is the good doctor a closet fashion designer?" Probably the author, Elizabeth Stein, is having an in-joke here: the actor playing Pretorius, the excellent Ernest Thesiger, was an expert in needlepoint, and even wrote a book on the subject, Adventures in Embroidery.

Addendum: see also The Time of Achamoth.

- Ray

Saturday, 7 March 2009

Dr Johnson's struggle

Further to Dr Johnson as he really was and Sutherland et al on Johnson et al, I see a new biography of Johnson is getting good reviews: Samuel Johnson: The Struggle (Jeffrey Meyers, Dec 1, 2008, Basic Books, ISBN: 9780465045716).

I saw it mentioned in yesterday's Daily Mail 1 - Revealed: Why the moralising Dr Johnson DIDN'T hold forth on his own love life - which, apart from the prurient lead, is a pretty fair portrait of Johnson's tormented complexity, much of which was airbrushed out in Boswell's classic account, good though it is. The more measured Los Angeles Times review by Tim Rutten ('Samuel Johnson: The Struggle' by Jeffrey Meyers "The new biography does justice to one of the English language's towering intellects") admires Meyers' approach of integrating Johnson's many facets, rather than treating him as a great writer with a catalogue of incidental quirks. (For instance, if the diagnosis of Tourette syndrome 2 is correct, Johnson's amazing quickwittedness and his bizarre array of tics and mannerisms are two sides of the same coin).

[Meyers'] is the first biography to recognize that personal history, habits, eccentricities, style and achievements were inextricably intertwined in what we would call personality.

Judging by the sample available at Amazon.com, it looks in addition extremely readable.

- Ray

1. ... which I abhor for its general "Asylum seekers laugh at dying Diana as house prices plummet" fixations and its crusade to divide all substances into those that cause cancer and those that cure it, but it often produces surprisingly good articles on historical topics.
2. Doctor Samuel Johnson: 'the great convulsionary' a victim of Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome, J M Pearce, J R Soc Med. 1994 July; 87(7): 396–399.

Tuesday, 12 August 2008

Sutherland et al on Johnson et al

Further to Dr Johnson as he really was, see Say it again, Sam (John Sutherland, The Observer, August 10 2008) and Not tired of this life (Philip Hensher, The Spectator, 30th July 2008) and Blame it on Boswell (Christopher Taylor, The Guardian, August 9 2008), three of a number of current reviews of Peter Martin's Samuel Johnson: A Biography (Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 2008, ISBN 9780297607199). It looks rather good. As Sutherland says, we can't add much to the closely-observed personal detail written by the people who knew Johnson, such as Mrs Thrale who tells us how "the foretops of all his wigs were burned by the candle down to the very net-work" through reading at night. But we do have newer analytical tools that makes Johnson's pecularities more explicable, and cause for sympathy, in terms of depression and Tourette's syndrome.

The Observer review has a footnoted reference to John Sutherland's forthcoming Curiosities of Literature: A Book-lover's Anthology of Literary Erudition (Random House Books, ISBN: 190521197X). From the publisher's blurb:

How much heavier was Thackeray's brain than Walt Whitman's?* Which novels do American soldiers read?** When did cigarettes start making an appearance in English literature?*** And, while we're about it, who wrote the first Western,**** is there any link between asthma and literary genius, and what really happened on Dorothea's wedding night in Middlemarch? *****

Without diminishing the value of John Sutherland's more scholarly works (see his bibliography), for me this looks a welcome return to the discursive, eclectic and immensely readable books - Is Heathcliff a Murderer?: Puzzles in nineteenth-century literature and so on - that first brought his work to popular readership (see the previous A Nasty Case Of The Vapours).

* 376 grammes, if we're to believe Dissecting the brains of 100 famous men for science; "The Actual Weight and Tissue of the Brain Are Significantly Correlated with Mental Superiority, Says Dr. E.A. Spitzka --- The Twelve Biggest Brains in the World". (New York Times, September 29, 1912)
** Heinlein's Starship Troopers is on some lists, though not on this fairly standard US Army Combined Arms Center and Fort Leavenworth list where it's quite surprising to find Catch-22.
*** Around 1850? A number of people are smoking them in Dickens' 1857 Little Dorrit (EText-No. 963, Project Gutenberg); the concordance (p925, Penguin Classics edition, 2003) notes, interestingly, that the occurrence is anachronistic for the book's 1820s setting, since they didn't catch on until popularised by soldiers coming back from the Crimea with the habit. This isn't the only time Dickens makes such a mistake; Sutherland's earlier Can Jane Eyre be Happy? wonders why Magwitch in Great Expectations is sentenced to death for coming back to England a decade or two after the death penalty for returning transportees had stopped being enacted.
**** The classic answer is Owen Wister's 1902 The Virginian, a Horseman of the Plains, but Googling finds other contenders such as the many dime novels of Prentiss Ingraham including the 1887 Buck Taylor, King of the Cowboys; or the 1878 Live Boys, or Charley and Nasho in Texas (an account of a trail drive by Arthur Morecamp - a pseudonym for the Texas attorney Thomas Pilgrim); or even various 1860s chapbooks such as William H Bushnell's 1864 The Texan Herdsman: Or, The Hermit of the Colorado Hills. A Story of the Texan Pampas.
***** A long-running topic in academic analysis of the causes of Dorothea Brooke's rapid disaffection with her marriage to the elderly scholar the Reverend Edward Casaubon.

- Ray

Saturday, 24 November 2007

Dr Johnson as he really was

This is pure trivia, but I was struck this week by what a good casting Alfred Molina would make for Samuel Johnson. His picture, left, from the 24th November Radio Times shows a striking resemblance to Johnson as portrayed in the Sir Joshua Reynolds portrait, circa 1769, NPG 1445 in the National Portrait Gallery. You can see a bigger version on the cover of this CDC publication, and a different version of the same portrait here.

 Less trivially, much as I admire Robbie Coltrane's memorable portrayals of Johnson both in the Blackadder episode Ink and Incapability and the serious 1993 drama, Boswell & Johnson's Tour of the Western Isles, we have yet to see an attempt to portray Johnson as he truly was. The central omission is Johnson's documented mannerisms. This Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine paper, Doctor Samuel Johnson: 'the great convulsionary' a victim of Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome, provides extensive contemporary documentation, by Boswell and others, that Johnson suffered from a wide variety of tics and strange physical mannerisms, along with complex rituals and repetitive behaviours, consistent with Tourette's syndrome. This syndrome is also associated, in many cases, with creativity and quickness of thought consistent with Johnson's reputation for wit and clever disputation.

Even if you disagree with this specific diagnosis, the descriptions are clear enough to show that the standard portrayal of Johnson - stolid, pompous, with no abnormality of mannerism - is simply way off the mark. It would be interesting to see some production attempting to accurately portray this aspect of Johnson, which was fundamental to his personality and how others viewed him. It would require a tour de force of acting to do so, but not an impossible one (compare Daniel Day Lewis's engaging portrayal of Christie Brown in My Left Foot). The problem would be that going against a stereotype always carries the risk of being unbelievable.

- Ray