Thursday, 8 September 2011

The Great Refusal

Continuing the Maxwell Gray reading project, I just finished her 1906 novel The Great Refusal. In brief, it concerns a tycoon's son who gets an attack of social conscience about his father's business methods. Disinherited, he suffers hardship among the working-classes, but ultimately succeeds on his own merits and founds a utopian social movement. A longer synopsis:

Part I (Vita Nuova) introduces Adrian Bassett, son of the self-made Sir Daniel Bassett, as an undergraduate at Oxford. Over cigars and wine, he and his upper-crust friends - Airedale, Grimsby, D'Arcy and Lulworth - pontificate into the small hours about the materialism of the age, likening its general spirit to the "Great Refusal" (the rich young man in the Gospel of Mark who goes away disappointed when told by Jesus that to inherit eternal life he has to give up his wealth).
       The next day finds two young women, the undergraduate Blanche and her friend Isobel, on a walk in the country near Oxford; they encounter Adrian ("a sleeping faun" who has dozed off over a book after his late night). After brief acquaintance when he wakes, they discuss him - he is known to be faultess, even to the point of being considered a prig by some - and are evidently both interested.
       It is Commemoration Week, and Oxford is full of visiting relatives. Adrian has a brief twinge of jealousy when he sees Isobel with Airedale, but she turns out to be Lady Isobel Mostyn, Airedale's cousin and friend. Over a week of partying, he becomes increasingly attracted to her. He confides in Airedale, who tells him she has lots of admirers, but is not engaged.
       At "Bassett Towers", Sir Daniel is entertaining guests awaiting Adrian's return from Oxford, but gets news that Adrian has fallen ill with typhoid, evidently caught in the slums of London on philanthropic work at the university "settlement".  Adrian slowly recovers, cheered by a spray of flowers sent by an "I.M".  Isobel and Blanche (Ingram) are meanwhile discussing him, sounding out each other's feelings. Blanche reveals (she also works at an East End settlement project) that Adrian became ill after sitting in the rain despairing of ever improving the human condition.
       Adrian convalesces on a golfing visit to St Andrews, where matchmaking proceeds. On a romantic night-time excursion, Adrian expresses to Blanche his wish to win a certain woman - then dashes her hopes by revealing it to be Isobel. His social conscience is disturbed by the poverty and drunkenness he sees in the town. After a visit to his friend Lulworth, whose family's frugal "rural squire" lifestyle impresses him, he returns to Oxford, writing a McGonagallesque Valentine poem to Isobel.

Part II (Sturm und Drang Periode) continues two years later, when Adrian is working as a clerk for Stevenson's, Sir Daniel's retail chain. Isobel is still single, and her eventual marriage to Adrian looks a done deal, with the approval of Sir Daniel and her father, Lord Kilmeny. However, relations between Sir Daniel and Adrian become strained when Adrian describes as "cheating" the sharp business dealings that made his father's fortune. The incident passes, but Adrian keeps away from the house for a while. Blanche and Isobel have further conversation, during which Blanche finds herself shocked at the apparent absence of feeling Isobel has for Adrian.
       Adrian considers his options as the marriage date approaches. He speaks to his friends Grimsby, who has rejected an inheritance obtained from corrupt dealings (a rubber plantation whose owners committed atrocities), and D'Arcy, who married a governess and is living in relative poverty. Heartened that they are coping, he goes to visit his father. Sir Daniel is expecting merely that Adrian has come up to own up about overspending, and is ready to offer him a partnership in Stevenson's if he gets his act together. Adrian, however, tells his father that he considers the business exploitative to its workers, and can have no more to do with it. No compromise is possible: enraged, Sir Daniel disinherits Adrian.
       Adrian catches Isobel at a polo match and tells her what has happened, saying that their wedding must be postponed. She says that it's off, forever, because she can't be a poor man's wife. Friends and relatives beg Adrian to seek a reconciliation with his father, but he won't be swayed. Inspired that he has made the decision the rich young man in the Gospel of Mark failed to make, he prepares for a life of poverty.

Part III (Lehr und Wanderjahre) starts with the sale of Adrian's house and possessions, after which he disappears from public life. Sir Daniel hopes that the split will starve him into returning, like the Prodigal Son, but this fails to happen. But a year later, a young bearded workman wistfully follows the wedding procession at Westminster Abbey, where Lady Isobel Mostyn is married to the older Marquis of Aynesworth. She catches sight of the workman, and is visibly shocked (obviously it's Adrian). After the reception, it becomes clear the marriage is not off to a good start; Aynesworth shows himself to be pompous and intolerant; and despite both having agreed that the arrangement is one of convenience rather than passion, Aynesworth is clearly jealous at Isobel still having feelings about Adrian.
       Meanwhile it is revealed that Adrian has been working as a horsedrawn van driver in London. He has been spotted as being of his class, however, and he is dismissed for writing pseudonymous news stories critical of the company's management. At his lodgings he is tracked down by Airedale, who reproaches him for his obstinacy in sticking to this course. He suggests that Adrian come along to a meeting with Grimsby and D'Arcy, as they're looking for an editor for a weekly magazine they're founding. Adrian is interested, but says he prefers not to get directly involved.
       Some months later, we're introduced to "The Brotherhood", a group of upper working-class intellectuals formed to promote ethical business dealings. Airedale, after explaining its Christian-Socialist manifesto, reveals who has been bankrolling its magazine, The Reflector: Adrian. His arrival causes a stir; he's clean-shaven and well-dressed, having a new job as private secretary to an eminent politician. Some members think this disqualifies him from membership, but he argues successfully that The Brotherhood has no rules about appearance or profession, and that all his income comes from his own work.
       Isobel, meanwhile, is settling into her life as the Marchioness of Aynesworth, but she is tormented by thoughts of what might have been with Adrian, anxieties that come to a head when she unexpectedly runs into him in a semi-darkened room at her house and Lord Aynesworth sees her collapse into Adrian's arms. It turns out that he's there on legitimate business - to bring an urgent despatch from his employer - but the shock is so great that later she's found semi-conscious after injecting morphine.
       Isobel recovers, confiding in Blanche, who is also in regular contact with Adrian through a mutual interest in philanthropic work. Isobel finds contentment in a life separate from her husband. The Brotherhood (now formally called The Brotherhood of the Golden Rule) grows in influence, and Adrian develops a reputation as a writer and speaker. He calls on his father, and the two are reconciled sufficiently to talk amicably, agreeing to differ.
       Finally the Brotherhood puts into action plans to establish a utopian colony, Brothersland, in East Africa. Blanche intends to say behind, but Adrian asks her to marry him; she accepts, and they marry before sailing for Africa. The book ends with a statement of the founding principles of Brothersland.

It's all rather an odd mix: a work of social polemic cross-bred with MG's staple story of romance among the monied classes (and a very conventional romance at that: the hero loses the 'alpha' female - a beautiful aristocrat with the personality of a tennis ball - and wins the 'beta' female - the slightly less attractive but intelligent and capable Mary Sue). Nor was it easy reading: I've omitted much of the vast cast of minor characters, which are well-drawn but often leave the reader needing to correlate details from several chapters later to understand who they are. Also, MG's mature style (she was around 60 at the time of writing) combines her long-standing tendency to purple prose with a consciously literary style, leading to vastly over-written passages such as this attempt to convey Oxford undergraduate banter ...

"No, no. Peerages are the meed of mighty brewers. The Don of aftertimes will derive the term from beermakers, according to Bunsen's law, by virtue of which the 'b' of beerage assumes the later form of peerage. Others, from the known tendency of the beverage—mark the gradual evolution of the 'v'—to steal men's wits, may derive peer from an A.S. root, signifying thief"

... or this description of a golf shot:

The hand of many a gallant photographer quivered in the anguish of uncovering his camera at the right moment, and the breast of many heaved with fury as the head or shoulder of some heedless spectator wantonly invaded his foreground. The pulses of the intent crowd throbbed with often baffled expectation, as the eye of the great golfer measured the ground between the ball and the hole again and again, and he grasped his instrument with fierce and fell energy in both hands, first one way, then another, now another, now gently and deftly patting the turf immediately behind the ball, now, with glaring eye and bristling moustache, whirling the iron-shod club with an acrobatic twist of his whole body above his head and far behind him, with a force and determination so terrible as to strike cold fear into the hearts of the uninitiated bystanders, hitherto accustomed to hold such actions characteristic of cannibal islanders, ogres, and battle-axe men in armour; then, as if in the face of a duty beyond the power of mere humanity, sadly and slowly relaxing from this furious menace to a tamer and more peaceable attitude, till, from the rank of boomerang, battle-axe, or two-handed sword, the driving-iron sank to the level of a mere pacific umbrella, spade, or walking-stick, and the turf behind the ball was again gently, almost caressingly, patted by it. Then at last, in pity to bright eyes on the point of being suffused with tears of repressed emotion and manly breasts ready to burst with it, the great golfer suddenly and without the slightest warning, with a quick and complicated pirouette that threw him upon his other leg, whirled his club so fiercely and swiftly round that he seemed to smite his own shoulder with it, and in the rebound caught the ball clean in the centre with a quick crack that sent it singing in a fine arch to the long-envisaged hole. The crowd breathed; the last sunray vanished; and the great golfer sighed from the depths of a vast, immeasurable beatitude. He had not lived in vain.

As to the social polemic, it's clearly well-intentioned, and many of MG's ideas about the ethics of wealth and labour aren't dissimilar to those of late-Victorian Christian socialists. or the Arts and Crafts Movement (I know MG was a fan of Ruskin). However, the rules of Brothersland are as much feudal as socialist, and the ideals of the Brotherhood are inextricably mixed with MG's essentially reactionary pet peeves (as expressed in "A Plea for the Silence of the Novelist") about such things as advertising, mechanisation, bad novels, sex in fiction, and the decline of religion. Even as students, MG's characters are spouting middle-aged grouches about everything going to the dogs:

"The boy," Grimsby replied, "means that multitudinous novels have dissolved the nation's intellect in floods of verbose inanity." The boy explained on pressure that striving after effect and exaggerated horror of the obvious had reduced literature, or at least that outward body of it called style, to a mere play with words, an ingenious juggle with phrases, in which images as remote as possible from the meaning were twisted and forced to express it in clipped and freakish phraseology. "This verbal legerdemain has been carried to such a pitch that the best artists in this kind find it simpler to dispense with meaning altogether," he said.
...
"That is the canker at the core, that is the corrosive poison at the springs of national life: the spirit of commercial greed, the lust of luxury, the frenzied passion to be richer and ever richer, to make sudden fabulous fortunes, to outstrip every competitor in the base bestial game," he shouted. "Our pleasures are material; intellect, imagination, fancy, love of beauty come never into our pastimes; they are crushed out by the brute weight of wealth. Literature is dead, art degraded to mechanism. A spice of intellect in drama, a glimmer of thought in fiction, is fatal. Poetry is a lost art, conversation is extinct, manners are gone, courtesy dwindled to an irreducible minimum. We in England are merging into sheer plutocracy, the States are a despotism of trusts, rent by chronic war between labor and capital. France is a tyranny of intolerant fanaticism at open war with Christianity, Germany a vast barrack under martial law. European fiction and drama are concerned only with sensual enjoyment, sexual irregularities, and squalid slum tragedy."

It gets tiresome.
- Ray

Northwich sinks!

Artist's fantasy, from Harmsworth's Magazine
Following on from the previous post: the highlight from issue 2 (Sep 1898) of Harmsworth's Monthly Pictorial Magazine has to be In a disappearing Cheshire town ("the strange story of Northwich") by Percy L Parker.

This photo-feature shows the land and structural damage from major subsidence in the late 1880s. This was caused by the collapse of shallow rock-salt mines when, after the mines became uneconomical, salt extraction switched to the recovery of "bastard brine" (obtained by water injection, which dissolved what little structural support remained). This happened most spectacularly in the Great Subsidence of December 6th 1880:

Having been an eye-witness of the great subsidence of land at Northwich, on December 6th, I will endeavour to explain how it arose. The district, of which Northwich is the centre, has two beds of rock salt underneath it. The first one, about 40 yards from the surface, is on the average 25 yards thick. Below this there is a bed of much indurated clay, about 10 yards thick, and below this again the bed of lower rock salt, some 35 yards thick. From 1670 to 1780 all the rock salt mined was obtained from the "Top Rock," as it is locally called, and the miners left too few supporting pillars, and these not large enough, besides working the salt out so as to leave only a comparatively thin crust of salt as a roof. The great majority of the mines in the Top Rock salt have fallen wholly or partially. Since 1780 the rock salt has been "got" from the lower bed, and the pillars, especially of late years, have been left much larger, the roof at the same time being much thicker. Only from 5 to 6 yards of salt near the bottom of the bed has been worked. As a rule the mines in the bottom rock salt have stood firm, and where the owners have worked to their boundaries they have allowed the brine to run into the worked-out mines, thus converting them into reservoirs. The quantity of rock salt mined is small compared with the white salt manufactured. The white salt is made from a natural brine, which is found on the surface of the "Top Rock." It is found much cheaper to let the water do the mining and then pump up the salt in solution and drive off the water. The fresh water, as soon as it reaches the rock salt, eats it away till it gets fully saturated. This water running over the roofs of the old " Top Rock" mines has, in numbers of cases, eaten the whole of the salt away and opened a communication into the mine below. The overlying clays and earths, being deprived of their support, fall into the cavity thus opened, and a hole is made from the surface. On December 6th this was what occurred, and a hole or rift opened right across the course of the Wincham Brook, the water immediately rushing below. As the mines in both "Top" and "Bottom" rock were nearly exhausted of brine, the cavities to be filled, were enormous. Directly beneath where the fall occurred, and bordering on an old-abandoned Bottom Mine, was a rock salt mine being worked. The barrier between the two having been on two occasions penetrated, it now gave way, and opened a communication with 15 acres of mine having a worked-out depth of about 18 ft. Into this mine, down a funnel of 100 yards in length from the surface, the water rushed with great velocity, causing the lower portion of the brook to retrace its course and drain off a large body of water from the River Weaver and an adjoining lake called the Top of the Brook. This immense body of water, rushing into the underground cavities, drove out the air contained therein, and so violent was the compression of the air, that it forced its way through every portion of the contiguous district that was in the least rifted or weak, showing itself in violent ebullitions in all the neighbouring pits, and where the earth was fractured causing a number of miniature mud geysers of 10 to 12-ft. in height. Much property was seriously damaged, and a considerable piece of land covered with water. Five sets of salt works are stopped owing to the destruction of a road and the pipes conveying the brine from the pumping district to the works. The greatest sufferers by this subsidence had little to do in causing it, and this is one of the great anomalies of the system of obtaining salt. The property of numbers of persons in no way connected with the salt trade is seriously injured, and under the existing law no compensation can be obtained.
- "The Land Subsidence at Northwich" by Thomas Ward (speaking at an Ordinary Meeting, December 14, of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society)

A system for compensation for damaged/destroyed properties, by levying a tax on salt extraction in the area, took over a decade to be organised, against strong opposition from Salt Union Ltd; it was raised in Parliament as the Cheshire Salt Districts Compensation Bill of 1881, and finally passed as the Brine Pumping (Compensation for Subsidence) Act, 1891. Subsidence problems continued well into the 20th century, and a deal of Northwich's present-day folksiness derives from the readoption of historical timber-framed buildings that, unlike the brick ones they replaced, aren't completely dependent on the ground for their structural integrity.  See That sinking feeling (Lynn Pegler, Geographical, January 2008) for an account that brings the story up to the present day.

- Ray

Wednesday, 7 September 2011

The Harmsworth Monthly Pictorial Magazine

The previous post came from an early issue of the Harmsworth Monthly Pictorial Magazine, which looked worth further investigation. The magazine was launched late in 1898 out of the Amalgamated Press stable owned by Alfred Harmsworth. Here's its launch editorial:

OUR EXCUSE FOR THE ISSUE OF A SIXPENNY MAGAZINE AT THREEPENCE. SOME REASONS WHY.

The beginning of a new Magazine, once an event, is now so much a commonplace that the ancient excuse of the "long felt want" no longer serves.

In the days of the Nabobs, the gentle shaking of the Pagoda tree sufficed to bring great stores of wealth, but these be the times of the fallen rupee. Your modern Anglo-Indian toils out his existence for a bare pittance. And it is so in the making of Magazines. One hundred and fifty years ago the mere issue of the "Gentleman's" stirred to their depths the Coffee Houses and the Clubs, not only here in the Old Country, but in our North American Colonies as well.

Times are changed, alas! "The Harmsworth Magazine," though, indeed, it appeals to an English-speaking audience of over one hundred millions, will at best provoke a little favourable comment in the train and the library, for the Magazine field has been vastly exploited, and especially of late. A modern buyer of periodical publications rises as warily to a new lure as a twice-shot-over partridge to the gun.

The reader of Magazines has of late years been harried by a direct, by an enfilading, and a ricochetting fire of new adventures, some honestly and avowedly frivolous, others portentously literary, a few loftily artistic. Every imaginable plan has been adopted whereby his capture might be effected. Projectiles calculated to vanquish by size and weight of paper have been hurled at him; there have even been surreptitious and spy-like attempts to enter his domestic circle by seeking the favour of his wife and daughters by means of "Women's Departments," all frocks, furbelows, and complexion cures; and worse, his very children have been attacked by page on page of "Nursery Chat" and "Tiny Tales for Little Listeners."

Last straw of all, he has been patronised by the vast army of "Great Authors" of the period. And if the chit-chat of the press is to be believed there never were in Rome, in Athens, or in the days of Elizabeth herself, so many distinguished litterateurs as at present. The unfortunate victim has trembled at the solemn pomp of

'The editor of the 'Monster Magazine' has pleasure in announcing he has been so fortunate as to secure the masterpiece of Mr. ."

or,

"It is rumoured that Mr. . has been induced to enter into an agreement to contribute an important series of short stories to the "Monster Magazine" during the Spring of 1905. Mr. . is entirely occupied in the fulfilment of various contracts until that time."

It is "right here," as our American kinsmen have it, that "The Harmsworth Magazine" comes in.

Together with a great many other people, we came to the conclusion long since that a good deal of the literary wares that are foisted on the public by means of the ordinary advertising methods of personal paragraphs and "interviews" is mainly rubbish. Frankly and openly do we, therefore, declare that mere "names" will never command an entrance to the pages of this Magazine. As with our "Daily Mail" and our other journals, we shall rely on new writers. The public is weary of the reiteration of the same contributors to each of the monthly publications. He (and she) wants something new. It is our desire, for the sake of the public, for the benefit of young artists and others, and for our own profit, to avoid the productions of the professional "ring" of much advertised mediocrity which most assuredly dominates many of our Magazines to-day, though the work of really representative men and women will always be secured, without regard to its cost.

In selecting the price at which "The Harmsworth Magazine" should be issued to the British, Canadian, Australasian, South African, and Anglo-Indian public, we choose that of the two most distinguished journals in our language, "The Times" and "Punch."

Can such a publication as this be sold for 3d.? Provided we reach a gigantic circulation, we can do it. We are enabled to issue a threepenny Magazine containing more expensive literary matter, more numerous pictures, and more pages than the sixpenny Magazines of a few months back, at so ridiculous a price, because this Magazine is only a small incident in an organization controlling four daily journals and nearly thirty weekly periodicals; because we already possess and are now building printing machinery of an entirely novel and labour-saving nature.

The Magazine will be cheap as to price only. In every respect, save, perhaps, mere bulk, "The Harmsworth Magazine" will compete frankly, and without reserve, with older friends in the same field.

The experiment, largely due to a devoted band of workers, headed by my brother Cecil, is at least an interesting one. Will it succeed? Much depends upon the good word of those who read it. If it meets with your approval, if you consider that the enterprise is worthy of commendation, will you make our effort known to your circle?

Alfred C. Harmsworth.

The magazine was renamed the London Magazine in 1900, and continued in publication (renamed the New London Magazine in 1930) until 1933. Harmsworth, now better known as Lord Northcliffe, went on to an astonishingly influential career that combined innovative genius with jingoism, power-seeking and outright megalomania; he was the prime mover in creating the ethos of the modern tabloid newspaper empires.

The success of the Harmsworth Magazine isn't hard to understand; it's still extremely readable, combining fiction with quirky illustrated features. Issue 2 is online at Project Gutenberg (E-Text No. 29716) and includes:


Several volumes are accessible via Google Books (search result here) if you're in the USA or use a proxy server. Google finds other oddments; I especially liked If London Were Like Venice, a photo feature imagining a subsided London with canals instead of streets (see clickable index of illustrations).

- Ray

Tuesday, 6 September 2011

Tattooed royalty ... perhaps

I've seen this article reproduced elsewhere - for instance, at the online Tattoo Museum - but I thought I'd track it to source to get the bibliographics right. I've included those illustrations relevant to the title (click to enlarge).

Tattooed Royalty: Queer stories of a queer craze
by R.J. Stephen

When royalty hangs onto a craze, you may be assured that the rest of the exclusive world of wealth and power soon follow in the same path, and annex the peculiarities of the pleasures of which have given amusement to their heroes born in the purple.

What wonder, then, that tattooing is just now the popular pastime of the leisured world? For one of the best-known men in high European circles, the Grand Duke Alexis of Russia, is most elaborately tattooed. And Prince and Princess Waldemar of Denmark, Queen Olga of Greece, King Oscar of Sweden, the Duke of York, the Grand Duke Constantine, Lady Randolph Churchill, with many others of royal and distinguished rank, have submitted themselves to the tickling, but painless and albeit pleasant, sensation afforded by the improved tattooing needle, which is nowadays worked on a simple plan, aided by the galvanic current, the genius of the artist supplying the rest of the operation.

The Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, like his cousin Alexis of Russia is another elaborately-tattooed man; but even his decorations, and those of other profusely-tattooed men, fall short in point of quantity when compared with those marks upon the body of that Greek gentleman who was exhibited not long ago at the Royal Aquarium, whose body was completely covered with fine tattoo work, every square inch of it.

Anyone meeting the Duke of Newcastle, or the Earl of Portarlington, or Sir Edmund Lechmere, in the street, would hardly realize the fact that these gentlemen are proud wearers of tattoo marks—very much so.

We are able to give fac-similies of the designs which have been tattooed on the Duke of York, Prince Francis of Teck, Prince George of Greece, together with other examples of the art.

Professor Riley's work is pronounced to be, by no less that a celebrated Royal Academician, who takes considerable interest in tattoo work, the finest in the world.

The present fancy for being tattooed, according to Professor Riley—than whom an artist has tattooed more distinguished people—mainly exists among men who have travelled much; while ladies have also taken a strong liking to this form of personal decoration, which, from a woman's point of view, is about as expensive as a dress, but not so costly as good jewellery. In place of spending her spare time posing in front of the camera, or reclining her head in the dentist's chair, or placing herself resignedly in the hands of her coiffeur for something better to do, or for the purpose of passing her time in the "off" season, the lady about town now consents to be pricked by the tattoo artist's operating needle, and to have her forearm or shoulder adorned with perhaps such a mark as this—a serpent holding it's tail in its mouth—a symbol representing eternity.

In order to form an idea of the kind of work that is wanted by those who give their patronage to this specific class of fine art, a close examination of these illustrations will assist you. The skill of the tattoo artist, to be realized properly and fairly, must be seen in beautiful colours on a white skin—work which is amazing. The sketches he employs are made in various coloured inks. His great skill is in the faithful reproduction of any symbol or picture desired by the sitter. These designs vary in size from a small fly, or bee, to that of an immense Chinese dragon, occupying the whole space offered by the back or chest, or a huge snake many inches in thickness coiling round the body from the knees to the shoulders.

Tattooing has its humorous side, as well as its serious. A lover whose heart was once melted away in a soft, sweet, passionate love, got the artist to imprint in indelible inks, over the region of his heart, a single heart of charming and delicate outline, coloured, as it should be, in all the blushing tints, with the name of his loved one stamped thereon. Three years afterwards he followed the artist to London, and, seeking him out, with face pallid, the light of his eye almost gone out, and looking utterly miserable and care-worn, he requested that the tattooer to imprint under that same symbol, in bold, big letters, the work "deceived."

A well known army officer had tattooed over his heart the simple name of "Mary" with a lover's knot, but six months afterwards the same gentleman had the uncanny word "traitress" tattooed underneath.

An English actress had a butterfly tattooed on her fair shoulder, the initials of her fiance, "F.V.," being placed underneath. Not long afterwards she also came back and had the "F" converted into "E" and the "V" into "W", the letters reading "E.W." She eventually married "E.W." and to this day "E.W." thinks his initials were the first tattooed on her arm.

Colonials visiting England usually return home bearing on some part of their body an emblem of some national importance. This takes the shape of a portrait of the Queen, or the Standard, the Union Jack also not being despised.

A man may admire a favourite picture and desire a reproduction of it tattooed on his back, or upon his chest. Professor Riley is at the present time engaged "etching" on a mans back Landseer's famous picture "Dignity and Impudence," and when finished it will measure 12 by 9 inches. The same artist is also outlining on the chest of a Scotch baron a copy of Constable's famous etching, "Mrs. Pelham," after Sir Joshua Reynolds, the original etching of which fetched, in June last, at Christie's, the record sum of £425.

While most people are pleased to go through the performance of being tattooed just for the fun of the thing, as it were, many, on the other hand, approach the tattooer with a serious object in view. Eschewing all fancy designs, they choose frequently their own name and address as an aid to identification in case of accident, or, as has been the case recently, a wife may induce her husband to have her name tattooed on his arm, as a guarantee of good faith.

An official connected with one of our leading railways has had tattooed round his arm, in snake fashion, a train going at full speed. The scene is laid at night. The shades of evening envelop the snorting locomotive and flying carriages, while the rays of light proceeding from the open furnace of the locomotive are effectively shown lighting up the cars. There are lights, two, issuing from the carriages, showing how the passengers inside are passing away the time. Some of them are reading, some sleeping, some talking, some sullenly looking out of the windows. A darkened portion of the train is passing the signal box, and the dim light there from faintly lights up that part of the train. The picture is a perfect ideal of the tattooer's art, and shows the great advance tattooing has made during recent years.

Professor Riley has never done anything more striking or effective, if perhaps we accept the large snake he tattooed all around the body of a certain popular member of the Royal family, which is an extremely life like reptile.

As there are over 100,000 people in London alone who bear on some part of their anatomy evidence of the tattooing needle, it is obviously an impossible task to attempt to emmunerate, with fidelity to truth, the designs most favour by patient disciples, but these are many and various.

As regards the time usually taken to imprint marks on the body one may hazard a correct opinion. To work, say, a little house fly on your arm takes about fifteen minutes: but when you require an elaborate presentation done, comprising the reproduction of perhaps a celebrated picture, that, of course, would take time and cost you money. In a case like this the artist would "give you the needle" for a period extending to eighty hours divided into ten or twelve sittings, each sitting costing you perhaps a couple of guineas or more.

The cost of a fiercely-bearded ferocious-looking Japanese dragon, or a pretty Jap girl draped in all the finery of the coming Oriental nation, or a snake coiling around your body, would, of course, depend on how it was done—lavishly or otherwise—and wether the artist worked from some special directions.

Some people have tougher skins than the meat of their fellow creatures, and here the artist has to make his calculations as to time—the tough-skinned gentlemen presenting difficulties not to be taken into account when reckoning up the finer-skinned man. But a sitting does not last more than two hours.

Of all the classes of people who patronize the art, the worst to operate upon, singular to say, are medical men. An artist of the brush will sit patiently and direct operations in a way by suggesting little ideas which the genuine tattooer is not slow to act upon, but the medico fidgets dreadfully, and persists in wanting to know things - such as, for instance, to what depth the needle penetrates the skin, of what the pigment used are made, and if the tattooer has had or heard of any blood poisoning resulting from the operation of being tattooed; also what effect sitting so long and bending so much has on the operators chest—interesting questions, but problematical to the tattooer. The skull and bones symbol is the favorite one among medical men.

There are about twenty tattoo artists in London, some good, some very bad, some very indifferent.

Professor Riley is among the best.

- The Harmsworth Monthly Pictorial Magazine, Volume 1, Issue 5, 1898, pages 472-475.

This is interesting stuff, but I'm sorry to say that it's lousy history.  The names of tattooed royals are endlessly recycled on tattoo websites and in books on the subject - mostly without a scrap of corroboration from primary sources. These are very difficult to find; the highly formal dress of royalty didn't show much skin, but even when it does with sleeveless dresses, no such tattoos are visible in images - you'd have to postulate a media/artistic convention not to depict them.  Either royal tattoos are a major piece of secret history, or a major urban myth.

In search of actual sources, I encountered just one better-substantiated pictorial example, that of Marie, Princess Waldemar of Denmark. A number of commercial print sites, such as here, have an image from The Sketch for June 1(?) 190(?) captioned "The only tattooed royal lady", showing her with an anchor tattoo on her upper left arm. The New York Times for January 3rd 1895 has a, article, Denmark Court Scandal, attributing this to being part of a general pattern of eccentricity; it reports an anecdote that she had the tattoo done after hearing that all Danish sailors' wives had anchors tattooed on their arms. The article overall reeks of propaganda, a hatchet job on someone who was too much of a political loose cannon for the establishment; there's a much more sympathetic account here at the Esoteric Curiosa blog: Inbred Eccentricities Of A d'Orléans Princesse; Rocking The Royal Boat At The Danish Court In Copenhagen!

There are some further text sources predating the Harmsworth Magazine piece. The most solidly corroborated account is that of the tattoos of the brothers Prince Albert Victor and Prince George (the latter became George V) received in Japan in their mid-teens when they served as midshipmen aboard the HMS Bacchante. The 1886 The cruise of Her Majesty's ship "Bacchante", 1879-1882, compiled by John Neale Dalton from their diaries and correspondence, records this for October 27th 1881:

Oct, 27th. — Up at 6.30 A.M. and out for a beautiful ride on horse-back with Prince Louis of Battenberg and the Grerman minister ... We came back quite hungry for breakfast, after which we were tattooed on the arms ... Back to breakfast at 9.30 and then the tattooer finished our arms. He does a large dragon in blue and red writhing all down the arm in about three hours. He first sketches the outline on the skin in Indian ink and water, and then pricks in the colours required, blue or red, with little instruments that look like camel-hair-brushes, only instead of hairs they consist of so many very minute needles. One man mixes the colours and the other tattooes, holding the instrument in the right hand and grasping your arm with the left, while he tightens the surface of the skin on which the drawing is to be made between his thumb and fore-finger. We did not find the pricking hurt at all, but this varies with different people and according to the part of the body on which the drawing is made : the best parts to have tattooed are those where the veins do not lie near the surface. The man who did most of our party was beautifully tattooed over the whole of his body, and the effect of these Japanese drawings in various colours and curves on his glistening skin was like so much embroidered silk. Like so many of their old customs tattooing has been abolished by law, but these two artists were allowed to come to us in our own room here. Two others went on board the Bacchante, where they took up their quarters for two or three days, and had their hands full with tattooing different officers and men.

This rather erudite account improved on the reality as written by George in a letter to his mother:

We have been Tatoed by the same old man that tatoed Papa & the same thing too the 5 crosses. You ask Papa to show his arm.
- The Japanese Tatto and Britain during the Meiji Period, Noboru Koyama, Cambridge University Library (and in various biographies).

The medical journal Cincinnati Lancet-Clinic has an account by "T.C.M." of upper-class tattoos:

I was surprised not long since to see the arms of a very noble lady tattooed. This was Lady X. She has skin decorated with handsome coats of arms and flags in colors. I did not dare to ask my distinguished client any leading questions, but quietly undertook an investigation, and discovered that tattooing has just been introduced into England again among the aristocracy The Duke of York, the eldest son of the Prince of Wales and the future King of England, has reinstituted this barbarous fashion. It is hard to believe, but nevertheless true, that the husband of the beautiful Princess May is tattooed as much as the worst tattooed sailor in the English navy. His principal decorations are British flags, grouped and crossed on his forearms. The epidermis of His Royal Highness was illustrated by Professor Williams, the fashionable specialist of London, who will not tattoo such personages for less than fifty pounds ($250).

The Duke of York had a precedent for this, for his uncle, the new Duke of Saxe-Cobourg-Gotha, and the brother of the latter, no one else than the Grand Duke Alexis, are also artistically tattooed in colored inks. Many members of the House of Lords have followed the fashion of their future Sovereign, and have had themselves tattooed, some with simple initials, some with arms and escutcheons. As this is English, the latest, New York and Boston will probably import Professor Williams from London to decorate the epidermises of effete Americans with coats of arms. Such decorations, to be appropriate, should be applied on the gluteal regions, as the indications of asinine American imitation of British customs. A very distinguished member of the English Parliament lately visited Professor Williams, accompanied by his wife and five children, and the mother and children as well as the nobleman himself were tattooed with their names, titles and address, "so that in case of accident," remarked milord, " they will be known immediately. We see that the revival of the tattooing art among the aristocracy will sooner or later be imitated by the masses, and what was formerly considered a degrading operation among the aristocracy, and only worthy of the slum classes, has now been elevated to a high art.

For my part I can see no objections in tattooing one's arms with name and address; it has great advantages from the point of view of establishing an identity. If the process were not so complicated it would be better than the anthropometric scale of Bertillon. One might well be proud to wear a coat of arms upon his epidermis, but many a young man has been filled with remorse that he bore tattoo marks of a vulgar or obscene character in more mature life. All will remember the anecdote of Bernadotte, who one fine day became the King of Sweden. He was once very ill, and his physicians desired to bleed him from the arm. "Never!" exclaimed the old soldier of the Republic. His physicians insisted, representing the necessity of using this powerful and at the same time effective method of treatment. The King made every person leave his room except his own physician; then he pulled up his sleeve and bared his arm, upon which was tattooed in beautiful letters, Mort aux Tyrans! (Death to tyrants!)

How many individuals carry indelible traces in a moment of enthusiasm or of passion, or from following the caprices or fashions of the hour? The new fashion of an old and debased custom, just set by the Duke of York, the future King of England, will be followed by all the snobs and dudes of England and New England—the latter sad specimens, as regards fashions, with Tory tendencies.
- Parisian Medical Chit-Chat, T.C.M., The Cincinatti Lancet-Clinic, August 10, 1895, pp 140-141.

However, the polemical-gossipy tone casts some doubt on it as a source, and the Bernadotte story is especially doubtful. Sir Dunbar Plunket Barton's 1929 The Amazing Career of Bernadotte 1763 to 1844 traces it to a satirical 1833 comedy La Camarade de Lit, that ridicules Bernadotte's swing from revolutionary to king:

The plot of the play represented an ex-grenadier of the Royal-la-Marine Regiment as going to Stockholm to see his former comrade, Ex-Sergeant Bernadotte. The quondam mess-mates meet in the Royal Park, dine together and celebrate the occasion by donning the uniform of their former regiment. Exhilarated by their repast, they indulge in reminiscences, in the course of which the ex-grenadier reminds the King that he had once tattooed his arm with gunpowder. Carried away by old associations the King pulls up his sleeve and displays the indelible imprint of a Phrygian Cap and of a revolutionary motto, which is said to have been Mort aux Rois. The disclosure of this secret tatouage is the turning-point of the piece. The King is placed in such a dilemma by this compromising discovery that, in order to save himself from the necessity of abdication, he is compelled to give his consent to the marriage of the hero and the heroine, thus bringing thus bringing the curtain down upon a happy ending to the play. Perhaps it was this play which gave colour to a legend, which afterwards obtained wide currency, that Bernadotte was tattooed with republican devices.

So - are there any reliable sources for the great majority of allegedly tattooed royals (pictures, or first-hand accounts - outside self-promoting celebrity tattooist memoirs)?

- Ray

Sunday, 4 September 2011

Cotillon mirrors

I'm just part-way through Maxwell Gray's 1906 novel The Great Refusal, which is set among the moneyed English classes at the beginning of the 20th century.  As usual, it offers a mirror into social fixtures of over a century ago: in this case literally, as in this passage that was pretty enigmatic to me.

Not every woman can play the mirror part in the cotillon with both grace and coquetry. Isobel Mostyn did it with distinction; the man wiped off her mirror seemed "to taste delicious death," and be executed with tragic pomp; and even "that Jacob Hildenheim" appeared less blatantly common than usual after being blotted off the glass.
- page 162, Maxwell Gray, The Great Refusal, D. Appleton and Company, 1906

A cotillon (from the French cotillon, "petticoat", but often Anglicised as cotillion) was a mixed-sex social dance that comprised a series of fairly complicated 'figures' (set dances) - fortunately a dance director talked the participants through the moves - that I suppose acted as a kind of speed dating. Some figures were danced with everyone, but others featured choosing rituals giving plenty of opportunity to express a preference for a particular partner. The heyday of cotillons lasted from the late 1700s into the beginning of the 20th century, the form varying somewhat according to the fashionable dances of the time; William B De Garmo's The Prompter: containing full descriptions of all the quadrilles, figures of the German cotillon, etc. has a typical description (see page 51 onward).

Maxwell Gray wasn't the only one to refer to the mysterious "cotillon mirror". In Robert Smythe Hichens's 1898 The Londoners, there's this passage:

Lying there alone, Mrs. Verulam said to herself that she was utterly sick of this concert, which each succeeding year persistently encored. She heard the distant wheels, and thought of the parties to which they were rolling. She heard the very remote music of a band; and that reminded her of the quantities of cotillons she had led, and of the innumerable faces of men that she had wiped out of mirrors with her lace handkerchief. How curiously they flashed and faded on the calm surface of the imperturbable glass, their eyes full of gay or of languid inquiry, their mouths gleaming in set society smiles!

Was it a property of cotillon mirrors, she wondered, to make all men look alike, neat, vacuous, self-satisfied?
- Robert Smythe Hichens, The Londoners, 1898

And:

'For myself,' he added, 'I shall be delighted when the faces of no aspirants are reflected in your cotillion mirror. I detest all those men.'
- Ouida (Marie Louise De la Ramée), Othmar, 1885

A spot of further Googling finds the explanation: this is one of the 'choosing ritual' figures of the cotillon, and a number of other fictional accounts give a full explanation of the mirror scenario.

Meanwhile the cotillon was going on rapidly. A chair had been placed in the middle of the circle, a young lady was placed in it, and a little looking-glass was put into her hands. One by one the gentlemen were brought up behind her chair. She turned the glass upon them, and if the face reflected in it pleased her, she rose and danced with its owner, if not, she passed her handkerchief across the mirror.
- page 46, Behind the Scenes in Paris: A tale of the clubs and the secret police, Titan magazine, 1858

And in more detail, a passage that shows it was a two-way process; if the man didn't want to be chosen, he could always gurn in the mirror:

A chair was placed in the centre of the room, and every one polked round the room, till some one couple polked up to the chair, and the lady was left seated there, and was given a hand-mirror. (Fred said it looked as though the lady were going to dress her hair, and he called her the lady in the enchanted chair, in Comb-us, and said that we were the rabble rout—which was quite true, for we made a great noise, and were very disorderly). Of course the other couples ceased dancing when the lady was placed in the chair. Her partner then went and brought up another gentleman, and placed him behind the chair; and the lady looked in the mirror; and, if she pretended that she did not like the reflection, she rubbed her handkerchief over the glass. Her partner had then to bring up another gentleman; and, if she rubbed him out, a third gentleman had to be brought; and so on, until she was quite satisfied. And, when she saw in the mirror the reflection of any one she approved, she jumped up, and the favoured individual took her as his partner, and polked off with her—her late partner seeking out the other gentleman's partner, and all the company polking on round the room, until some one else was seated in the chair, and then the whole affair was da capo.

When Madge was seated in the chair, she pretended to be very difficult to please; and she had—oh! at least a dozen gentlemen brought up to her; and sometimes, after carefully examining the reflection, she would rub away at the glass as though she violently hated the man, and would not have him on any account; and, perhaps, the gentleman was making faces in the glass, and doing all kinds of ridiculous things. Hyacinth Brown kept on rubbing out people until dear Walter was led up behind her chair, and then she very quickly put down the mirror, and danced off with him, looking as pleased as—yes, as Punch!
- page 283, Love's Provocations, Cuthbert Bede, in  Hogg's Instructor, 1854

There were hundreds of cotillon figures, but this one - perhaps as it's such a vivid metaphor for showing a character's feelings about a choice of partner, or to indicate that a character had a large choice of suitors - seems to have particularly appealed to novelists.

(The passage by Cuthbert Bede - the pseudonym of Edward Bradley - is the first time I've ever seen the verb "to polk" = to dance a polka. It's in the OED as "colloq. (now rare)").

- Ray

Friday, 2 September 2011

Anglick

A while back - see Ansible ... and Anglish - I mentioned various attempts to imagine an English purged of French and Latin influences, such as the 'Pure English' of the Dorset poet William Barnes, the 'Blue-Eyed English' of the composer Percy Grainger, and the SF author Poul Anderson's essay on atomic theory, Uncleftish Beholding.

A question on Yahoo! Answers, "What would English look like today without the French influence?", prompted me to a rethink. Interesting though these attempts are, they're essentially modern English, removing French and Latin but retaining all the innovations (such as the massive simplifying of grammar) that marked the vast 'reboot' from Old English (aka Anglo-Saxon) to Middle English and later Modern English.

An English (let's call it 'Anglick') where no Norman invasion happened would more likely be an entirely different branch of the Germanic languages, even more dissimilar to English than Yola, with many more features akin to Old English (for instance, it might - like modern German - retain grammatical gender and case endings). I imagine the Lord's Prayer in Anglick could look like this ...
Vaider arn thu beest on evvinem
Gehagled be thi narmer
Becoom theen kernyrike
Gedaan theen villa
On arder soso on evvinem
Arne daglicke brode geev uns hoady
An ar gildies uns vergeev
Soso weer andern gildeen vergeeven
An nae layde thu uns in costening
Arba layde thu uns vorm ooble. Zo beest.
... and even this, as the language of the King James Bible is to English, could be archaic Anglick. Who knows where English could have borrowed from?

- Ray

Thursday, 1 September 2011

Happy is the man that hath a sister

"Happy is the man who has that hath a Sister, that who with her tender lover and care, cheers him ever on thro' the intricate paths of life. And thrice happy is he to be able to recall the day on which she came into this world to bless him with a sight of her dear dear face".

How joyful am I my Sister
To congratulate thee "This day".
For thy love to me my Sister;
Has been a sweet solace and stay.

For my dear Sister Lizzie
on her birthday. 23rd August 1875.
from
Edmund C Hemming.

In handing antiquarian books, you occasionally run into personal memorabilia that give a glimpse into the lives of their long-dead owners. I just ran into the above dedication (click to enlarge) in an undated Gall & Inglis hardback edition of the collected works of Longfellow.

By modern standards it's over-the-top, if not creepy. But the the Victorians, despite their reputation for uptightness, could swing to the intensely sentimental. The dedication is written on a piece of high-quality notepaper with an impressive interlaced relief monogram "ECH", pasted on to the first page of the book, what must have been an expensive edition with a tooled and gilded cover.

I don't know the provenance of the book, but the names and date are probably specific enough to trace from census data who Edmund and Lizzie were.

- Ray

Saturday, 27 August 2011

Bayan time (8)

Good result on the public performance front: this afternoon I busked for charity on Topsham Fore Street (it's Topsham Carnival Day, when they close the road to traffic after lunchtime). Being far less in the spotlight than at the Passage House Inn event, I didn't find anxiety a problem. The chief sensation was of needing to concentrate on staying "in the zone"; I did fluff a few notes when my attention drifted on to something else, but I even managed to keep playing when one of the shoulder straps on the bayan came unhitched. That would have thrown me only a couple of months ago. The proceeds came to £14.40: first paid gig - even if it's not for me - and not bad for 40 minutes or so (I have about 20 minutes of rehearsed repertoire now, and did two slots at the beginning and end of the afternoon).

- Ray

Friday, 26 August 2011

Glorious but gloomy



















The bookshop where I work just acquired a small souvenir publication called Glorious Devon (softback, 27x19cm, 18 plates 18.5x11cm, Harvey Barton & Son, Ltd., Bristol, c. 1930).  The artist is uncredited.

The paper being thoroughly yellowed, I thought I'd photograph it and have a go at enhancing the images with GIMP (Gnu Image Manipulation Programme).  After correction of the overall yellow cast, the colours still look rather strange: partly, I suspect, because of different colours of inks fading at different rates; and partly because the pictures do seem to have very sombre to start with, with a distinctly chiaroscuro style.  Most, as you can see from the house and street lights being on, are moonlit night scenes, which suggests the intention of the collection was artistic rather than to produce conventional picture-postcard scenes.  Anyhow, they have a certain austere charm.

Click to enlarge.

Addendum: I just spotted a piece of artistic license in the image of Ilfracombe (here).  Whatever is the object in the sky?  The view is looking north: neither the sun nor the moon could be in that position.

- Ray

Wednesday, 24 August 2011

One kabano, two ...?

A third Salisbury-related post: I was pleased to find, on the road from the railway station to the city centre, a superb Polish delicatessen called Taste the World that sells genuine kabanosy. This is the famously delicious cured and smoked sausage: dry, faintly chewy, and flavoured with just a touch of pepper, nutmeg and caraway seed.

A year or two ago I was embarrassed on realising that for the 30+ years since I first encountered it, I'd got the name wrong. Not knowing about plurals in Slavic languages, I'd thought it was one kabano (i.e. kÉ™bÉ‘nəʊ), two kabanos; when it's actually one kabanos (kæbÉ™nÉ’s), two kabanosy. There's a saying, misattributed to Bismarck, that "Laws, like sausages, cease to inspire respect in proportion as we know how they are made", and the EU document Publication of an application pursuant to Article 8(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 on agricultural products and foodstuffs as traditional specialities guaranteed (an application for the name "kabanosy" to be granted traditional speciality status) rather does that.  It is, however, enlightening about the etymology:

The name expresses the specific character of the product. In 19th century Poland and Lithuania the term "kaban", or the diminutive form "kabanek", referred to extensively reared young hogs which used to be fattened mainly with potatoes, and the meat they produced was customarily called "kabanina". "Kabanos" is derived from the name used to designate these hogs.

There's a different sausage, cabanossi, typically made in Germany and Austria, whose texture is generally rather more like a light salami (for British readers: it's like Matteson's Smoked Pork Sausage - the Australian equivalent is called cabana or kabana). There is some overlap of styles, though; some cabanossi, such as the Greisinger brand sold by Waitrose, are much closer to kabanosy in flavour and texture. "Cabanossi" appears to be a very recent word; along with "kabanossi", it first turns up in Austria in the 1970s.  The German Wikipedia's etymology for "cabanossi" goes into rather laboured explorations of it being named after a ship's cabin or hut.  At the risk of leaping to a false cognate, to me it seems much more likely that "cabanossi" is just a straight phonetic import of "kabanosy" from Polish.

- Ray